Subclausal Local Contexts

Abstract One of the central topics in semantic theory over last few decades concerns nature local contexts. Recently, theorists have tried to develop general, non-stipulative accounts contexts (Ingason, 2016; Mandelkern & Romoli, 2017a; Schlenker, 2009). In this paper, we contribute literature by drawing attention subclausal expressions. More specifically, focus on quantificational determiners, e.g. ‘all’, ‘both’, etc. Our tool for probing elements is principle Maximize Presupposition! (Percus, 2006; Singh, 2011). The empirical basis our investigation some data discussed Anvari (2018b), fact that sentences such as ‘All two presidential candidates are crooked’ unacceptable. order explain this, suggest context determiners needs contain information carried their restrictor. However, no existing account predicts this. Consequently, think expressions will likely be stipulated. This result has important consequences debates semantics and pragmatics, those around so-called “explanatory problem” dynamic (Heim, 1990; 2009; Soames, 1982).